Since being introduced at my school and adopted by a few "savvy" teachers, the interactive whiteboard has been installed in every classroom to the disproval of some teachers. Ferriter writes "hanging them on walls and showing them off like proud hens that just laid the golden instructional egg."(2010) Parents are indeed amazed when they see what an interactive whiteboard can do, and the students love to use the pens to draw pictures, but up to this point, I would agree in some ways with Ferriter's views that the interactive whiteboard is really just an expensive tool that allows the teacher to spend more time standing in one place. “I’m willing to argue that even with time and training, interactive whiteboards are an under-informed and irresponsible purchase. They do little more than reinforce a teacher-centric model of learning…make presentations, give notes, deliver lectures…I ask you: Do we really want to spend thousands of dollars on a tool that makes stand-and-deliver instruction easier?” (Ferriter, 2010)
Heather Wolpert-Gawron writes on her Tweenteacher blog "while these boards were initially meant to help less-tech savvy teachers to embrace technology use, their hefty training time and prep time serves as its own gatekeeper for more than just tech tentative teachers." (2011) I found that using an interactive whiteboard was incredibly intuitive, and I enjoyed finding new resources to use in my beginning days. Lately, I stick with what I am familiar with to support my lessons. Technology has always been intuitive for me though, and I am constantly amazed at the time dedicated in my school to using the activeboards. I wonder if Wolpert-Gawron is on to something when she talks about using all that money and time in other places to improve other parts of their teaching. Is technology something we need to force onto teachers to use if they survived a long time teaching without it?
I started using the interactive whiteboard a few years before the iPod touch and the smartphone and ipad, and I definitely got caught in the naive scenario of thinking the interactive whiteboard would be the game changer. As with all technology in the classroom, the game changer is the teacher and these days schools do not have the funds to support new technologies as easily. I know how much of a game changer the smartphone was to my personal life, and I am so impressed with the apps and technologies being developed to use these tools in the classroom. I dream of a day when each of my students has an iPad on their desk.
"As for the future of educational technology, we must guide our purchases to reflect the world around us. We must support the learner on the go. We must support individual use, not teacher-only use. We must support inexpensive options that give us access to the most information, easily accessed and easily presented. Smartphones, (and, I believe, eventually iPads or other tablet options) permit us to assume more and more that learners have access to the same information and opportunities." (Wolper-Gawron, 2011)
I have the fear that I am taking for the granted the so called efficiency that the interactive whiteboard brings to my classroom. I feel like after 4 years of use, it is time for me to evaluate the worth of this device and whether it is helping to improve the learning which occurs in my classroom.
Wolpert-Gawron, H. (2011, October 3). How the interactive whiteboard is really ed tech's laserdisk. Tweenteacher. Retrieved October 26, 2011, from http://tweenteacher.com/2011/10/23/how-the-interactive-whiteboard-is-really-ed-techs-laserdisk/
Great thoughts Brad. I too think there needs to be a shift in purchasing, a shift in creating a student-centric model, and even fully implementing a BYOD policy in schools.
ReplyDeleteThe interactive whiteboard phenomenon did much to encourage teachers to utilize technology in the classroom, however it is not a replacement for good teaching through technology. Good teachers make the technology invisible yet available to all students as needed while at the same time allowing students to be the center of the learning process.
I agree the teacher is still the key. We only have one interactive whiteboard in my school. it was only installed two years ago so it is still a new thing. It is still a novelty.
ReplyDeleteFrom your Wolpert-Gawon link, "Currently, they are only as engaging as the lessons created, and those lessons are tedious to create and time-suckers in their efficiency."
That to me is the problem. If I can you technology to improve instruction without having to take extra time to prepare it then I find it useful.
I have prepared things that students devour in minutes after I spent hours preparing.
Someone said in a conversation recently, that a projector hooked up to a computer in classroom is cheaper and more efficient for teaching.